<Four of them (with NonCommercial or NoDerivatives elements) are clearly <not intended to be DSFG-free. It seems to the untrained eye that the <other two (Attribution and Attribution-ShareAlike) are. The problems we <have with these licenses are more or less ones of clarity and wording <rather than intention.
My doubt is: dfsg should cover the 4 freedom of fsf. How does CC respect the availability of source code? I mean FDL does something like that with the provision of a copy in an open format when you distribute a certenly amount of copies. Can we consider dfsg-free a song which can be playd just in MSplayer, or a text readable just whit adobe reader? Tom _____________________________________________________________ <---o0o---> Aconsegueix [EMAIL PROTECTED] gratuÏtament a http://teatre.com :-))-:
