Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > A typical warranty disclaimer doesn't prohibit you from suing the > > author; it just makes it less likely that you would win if you did. > > That's a bogus reason. A typical "you must give the author 1000 $ / > month" doesn't prohibit you from paying nothing; it just makes it less > likely that you would win if he sues you.
My point was that typically the disclaimer is not a condition of the licence. In particular, it is intended to apply even if you don't accept the licence. Do you dispute that point, or are you just criticising the way I presented it?
