Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 11:24:29PM +0200, Florian Weimer > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> * Lucas Nussbaum: >> >> > IANAL, but the license[4] look quite ok for me, even if the part about >> > GPL compatibility seems a bit unclear. >> >> It looks like a fallback close similar to the LGPL. My french is >> rusty, though, I shouldn't try to interpret contracts. 8-> > > Alex Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was able to find the english version > of the license. It's here : > > http://www.inria.fr/valorisation/logiciels/Licence.CeCILL-V1.US.pdf
I didn't even bother to read most of it; it's too damn long. Clause 5.3.4 should render it GPL-compatible. However, dammit, GPL is *not defined* in the license; it should be defined up top. This is a license bug. -- There are none so blind as those who will not see.
