<On Tuesday 13 July 2004 01:06 am, Jacobo Tarrio wrote: <> O Martes, 13 de Xullo de 2004 ás 00:56:39 -0700, Sean Kellogg <escribía: <> > back to B due to lack of communication facilities. The duty in <question <> > will be discharged by the court under section 261 provided section <263 is <> <> 95% of the world population does not live in the US. < <With great respect to the 95% of the world population that does not <live < <within the US... the great majority of the world does operate under <laws <derived from the common law system, which is embodied within the <restatement <of law (there is one for each area of law). Even in the civil law <societies <(most of continental Europe and Japan) the law has been adopted from <the
Usa is expanding his hegemonic power even in legal system transplant through institution as wipo-tripp's, wb,... especially in IP aspects; that's true. But -i'm european law student- a legal system is more complicated than this. I find such diversity overall in procedure, and this diversity sometimes would be able to bring to different solutions in differnts countries. Chinees are about 1/2 of world beeings, and apart of the lasts overture to free market, i don't really know how USAed is their legal system. I think we have to consider this, otherwise i see the danger of just-usa-DFSG-free. Tom _____________________________________________________________ <---o0o---> Aconsegueix [EMAIL PROTECTED] gratuÏtament a http://teatre.com :-))-:
