MJ Ray wrote: >> I suspect a first step is to split the licences into copyright and >> trademark sections if possible. That's not necessarily necessary if it's a very permissive license and is written very carefully, but it is probably a good idea.
>> I assume this needs to be a US law >> copyright licence and proposed to SPI's board as copyright holder? Or >> must debian instruct them somehow? If both, which route first? Here's my model no-nonsense license (for the "Open Use" logo; I'm not going to worry about the other one). Copyright license: "You may copy, distribute, modify, and distribute modified versions of this logo." Trademark license: "You may use this logo or a modified version of it to refer to Debian. You may not use this logo, or any confusingly similar logo, to refer to anything else in a way which might cause confusion with Debian." Final clarification: "(If you have a modified version of this logo which is not confusingly similar to the original, you may use it for any purpose.)" Please nitpick and polish. Perhaps we can present a 'fait accompli' to the Project and SPI. -- There are none so blind as those who will not see.
