On 2004-07-19 16:33:34 +0100 Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
1) point 6c of the QPL fails the chinese dissident or desert
island tests.
Apart from the the dubious justification of those tests (i would
much have
prefered particular DFSG points), i believe that the licence sets
implicitly
the cost of data transfer to the person requiring the sources.
[...]
I am still contemplating whether the actual source transfer is a fee
in itself. There have been some interesting replies to that idea.
2) the court of venue issue. All lwasuits must be filled at
Versailles.
Well, i am no lawyer, but i hardly find this non-free [...]
Why is it free? Why should the licensor be allowed to make any
licensee to represent themselves in France? Much of your argument
seems to be about choice of law rather than choice of venue. I think
most people accept choice of law.
That said, i made those objections, and nobody cared to CC me their
reply,
if they did reply.
I have been away. I find your impatience as irritating as your
continual unprovoked rudeness and paranoia.
For example, you must surely know why grep won't give a true list of
affected packages, if you have given it any real thought. If you still
don't get it, go look at the policy manual. (This is not my preferred
style. It is an example of what Sven Luther keeps doing.)
--
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and not of any group I know
http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ for creative copyleft computing
Please email about: BT alternative for line rental+DSL;
Education on SMEs+EU FP6; office filing that works fast
