On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 12:40:10PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > Ok if you want to focus on that aspect, I've included enough material > > in this thread to show you what you originally said, and the way you > > said it. > > All right. Which licenses to we accept as DFSG-free even though they > violate DFSG 1?
I started to do a point by point response, but it boils down to this: The way the GPL is written, if riders place any additional restrictions on the code, the GPL doesn't grant any permission to distribute the code. [The copyright holder, of course, doesn't need any such permission.] -- Raul
