On 2004-07-19 19:07:58 +0100 Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 01:39:14PM -0400, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
I don't think personal insults really help anything. What I see is a
Well, you claimed there was a consensus, while there is clearly no
such thing.
Thus it is a lie [...]
Hrm, when did Brian claim his was the consensus view? Calling someone
a liar should not be done lightly.
Well, again, if it came to a GR i doubt debian would actively support
code
hoarders.
I doubt they would actively support offensive licensors either, so any
such GR would be an interesting choice of the lessor of two evils.
A, a consensus is one where there is no discordant voice, right ?
Wrong.
What much more ? And what do you loose if upstream is allowed to use
your code
in the main product, and thus everyone profits ? Again, only a code
hoarder
would reject this kind of clause, and as thus get no sympathy from me.
Can upstream not put it in the main public download product, only the
Super Contrib Version given to their paying friends under the QPL?
[...]
And i hope you don't tell your AM that you are code hoarding, i doubt
he will
appreciate.
I hope you don't tell your AM how you behave. I doubt they would
appreciate it, either.
--
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and not of any group I know
http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ for creative copyleft computing
Please email about: BT alternative for line rental+DSL;
Education on SMEs+EU FP6; office filing that works fast
