On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 09:11:07PM -0400, Walter Landry wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 12:59:33PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > | Choice of Law > > | > > | This license is governed by the Laws of France. Disputes shall be > > | settled by the Court of Versailles. > > > > Ok, this is the last point of contention. The choice of laws seems to be > > acceptable, and the choice of venue seems to be the only thing under > > discussion, altough the DFSG doens't make any mention of it. > > > > I would thus consider it to be a minor inconvenience to any honest recipient > > of the > > software, and have a hard time realising that this would be an insurmentable > > cost in any case, beyond a few international phone calls, letters or other > > ways of remote conferencing. > > > > The cost of hiring a lawyer in france local to the Court of > > Versailles is probably less or similar to the cost of hirinig a > > lawyer of similar competence and fluent in the Laws of France, in a > > country local to the defendent. > > If I don't speak or read French (or English), it is going to be rather > difficult to find a lawyer in France.
Bah, you know that some french people speak english, probably a lot more of US-ihabitant who speak french, so ... Friendly, Sven Luther
