Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> The plain reading says you may not alter or remove copyright >> notices. That means, as far as I can tell, that you can not alter >> or remove such notices without breaking the license. If it was >> supposed to mean something else, surely they would have written >> something else. > > So why didn't they ?
What? Why are you asking *me* this? You're the one claiming to have knowledge of what was really meant by the license, if it's read at a proper angle through a lens of absinthe. My assumption is that they wanted to ban certain modifications of their work, and were more concerned about maximizing credit than writing free software. -Brian -- Brian Sniffen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
