Josh Triplett writes: > > * Uneven licenses, which have multiple distinct free paths, are Free > > as long as there is one Free path. That is, "BSD to teachers, GPL > > to everyone else" is OK. If I'm a teacher, I have a free license > > and can distribute my changes under any license I like, including > > the BSD. If I'm not, I have a Free license, the GPL, and can > > distribute my changes under the GPL, the same license I received. > > Right.
How do you reconcile that particular example with DFSG 5 and 6? If it were just "you may choose your rights from license X, Y or Z" and any of the choices were free, I would agree that the work is free, but if it were "BSD to teachers, GPL to everyone else", I would read that as discrimination. Michael Poole