Juhapekka Tolvanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is that license free according to DFSG?
It probably fails the Chinese Dissident test, but I don't think that's a problem. The requirement to not modify "descriptive text" that provides attributions /may/ be a problem, but that'll depend on specific code rather than being a general problem (in the same way that the GFDL's granting of permission to add invariant sections isn't a problem - but people using that permission is). I think it's probably DFSG-free, but plainly GPL incompatible. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
