Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That's not the Mozilla authors' decision; "confusingly similar" is a call to > be made by a judge, and common sense is a strong indicator for this. If the > Mozilla authors try to claim that "freebird" and "thunderbird" are > confusingly similar, they should be ignored. (The names "firebird" and > "freebird" could be considered confusingly similar, however; I wouldn't opt > for "freebird" as a replacement name here without buy-in from the Mozilla > folks.)
If you want their buy-in for the last, it's only polite to seek their agreement for the earlier names. And what does it cost to build a little good-will with other projects? -- Brian Sniffen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
