Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 07:08:23PM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote: >> So you are basically saying that aiding or hinting the end-user to >> create these would-be derivative works is enough to be violating the >> license? > > That's overstated. It's enough to have to argue the point in court and > be unsure of the result, which is bad enough that we can't really go > there. > >> Then how can things like thepiratebay.org be legal? > > They aren't with any degree of certainty.
It's certain enough that Microsoft have failed to shut them down. -- Måns Rullgård [EMAIL PROTECTED]