Sean Kellogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> License 1 contains a limitation on use ("educational, research and non-profit
> purposes, without fee") which is a violation of DFSG #6. License 2 is less
> obvious, but I personally believe that a provision that forbids charging a
> fee for distribution is non-free, or at least bad policy. Certainly having a
> package that prohibits charging for distribution would prevent it from being
> on a Debian CD sold by one of the vendors. Based on the DFSG I'd have to
> point to #1 and #6... but both are kind of stretches.
That aspect of license 2 isn't a problem - the DFSG don't require that
people be able to charge for an item of software, merely the aggregate
work.
--
Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
