* Steve McIntyre: >>The interpretation I outlined is certainly not new. It reflects the >>current practice, and I think we're in a pretty good position as far >>as compliance is concerned. Even the notorious GNU FDL issue is not a >>real problem here (beyond the invariant section business) -- the GNU >>FDL requires open formats. > > I'm arguing with your interpretation of "program" to mean anything you > want - in this case potentially any random string of bytes.
Why do you think this would change anything? Isn't this the assumption under which debian-legal operates in general? With a few practical exceptions, of course (license texts, public key certificates, etc.), but the general rule seems to be followed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
