** Michael Poole :: > Potential penalties are irrelevant to my question. You assume a > priori that such linking is a violation of the GPL. My question was > why that assumption is valid. As I explained above, his citation of > case law does not fit the facts.
The only good answer people in d-l gave me to the question: "why is the assumption that such linking is a violation of the GPL valid?" is "because Eben Moglen said so in the GPL FAQ, and he is a law teacher, so it must be true". -- HTH, Massa -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
