Hi, for the FreeMind package, which I am maintaining as a non-DD, upstream has planned to use a new logotype, for which I couldn't find any license information (see [1]). Discussing with upstream, I suggested to apply the GPL license as the rest of the program has, against which they argued that the logotype is not supposed to be used for other things than FreeMind.
My current position is that any kind of license would be required to avoid uncertainty, but I'm a bit short on arguments for my position, and I'm not even sure it's the right argumentation. I didn't find anything specific in the Debian policy, so I come to you. Is a license required for such a logotype? Some arguments? Is there a standard one applicable? (I've seen that Debian has actually created its own [2]; a more generic one would be nice) Thanks a lot, Eric PS: I'm not on the list, please put me cc. [1] http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1246974&group_id=7118&atid=307118 [2] http://debian.org/logos -- Eric de France, d'Allemagne et de Navarre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
