On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 14:44 -0700, Michael K. Edwards wrote: > How many participants in the KDE/Qt brouhaha actually cited relevant > case law?
I recall that quite a bit of case law was discussed. Perhaps the debian-legal archives could tell you more. > In any case, there's a perfectly good argument that for > Debian to piss off the FSF is not a good idea whether or not they have > a legal leg to stand on. I personally would be ashamed to lend my > good name to their conduct in recent years, but YMMV. In this case, why do you continue to argue with what debian-legal thinks is the prudent course of action for Debian to take, especially when you admit that you may not agree with Debian's goals? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
