Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Trying other 'forums' will probably produce a *different* answer. > We use the DFSG as the guidelines to determine if a work is free or not. > Other groups/foundations/projects use *different* criteria.
Maybe, but there's not really much difference in result most times. > I'm referring to well-known cases such as Debian and FSF disagreeing > about the GFDL, and similar ones. Do they? FSF don't claim it's a free software licence, but that the desire for it to be one isn't sensible (or something like that). Anyway, yes, non-program licences and patent-related problems are things where debian-legal has a slightly different opinion to FSF leadership, but most aren't about those, licence proliferation is bad and we've done "what licence for text" to death in the archive. -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
