I agree that it's getting absurd. I'd be inclined to accept this and go with the upstream author's will; enable SSL and add information in the copyright file.
But still, i'd like to have more feedback on this issue. -Pascal On 8/30/05, Måns Rullgård <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pascal Giard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I maintain the mail-notification package and face a GPL+OpenSSL issue. > > I've tried to reach an arrangement with the upstream author but failed. > > > > Find the bug entry here: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=286672 > > > > Recently, a user posted a suggestion, i'd like to know if it's a > > valid solution. If not, is there anything else i can do? > > This is getting absurd. The usual argument here is that Debian should > follow the wishes of the upstream author, even if the legal > foundations are shaky. Why not in this case? > > -- > Måns Rullgård > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- XBGM# (http://xbgm.sf.net) MoviXMaker-2 (http://sv.gnu.org/projects/movixmaker) [e]MoviX[2] (http://movix.sf.net) Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org)
