> If you're going to make an argument at odds with established > understanding and industry practice then you'll have to come up with > more than that. > > There's an awful lot of lawyers and law professors who think that the > GPL works. Go start by arguing with them.
I can't argue with someone who offers ABSOLUTELY NO ARGUMENT. I asked you: why? you answered: "strawman and ad hominem". You could not provide an argument. The "established practice" is nothing more than respect (which I have, too) for RMS's/FSF's contributions to Free Software. It does not mean that the GPL has the meaning they convey. I am still waiting for a good argument coming from you. Respectfully, Massa -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
