On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 11:40:41AM -0400, Benj. Mako Hill wrote: > You seem to be making a call for interpreting the DFSG literally. I > think this is impossible. We should stay as close to the spirit of the > DFSG and we should rely on the text as our best clue. However, things > will *always* come down to human judgment calls at one point or > another.
So, is the spirit of the DFSG #5 to forbid choice-of-venue clauses, or the anonymous contributions of the infamous dissident test ? And who is to interpret the spirit of the different DFSG clauses :) Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
