On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 04:03:05PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > You really need to justify it based on the basic freedoms that the DFSG is > meant to guarantee. Note that not costing money isn't one of those > freedoms. Nor is preventing travel or a prolonged stay. Justifying > non-freeness in terms of basic freedoms has been done to my personal > satisfaction in this case, but the fact that people constantly are falling > back on the cost argument shows that the word hasn't gotten out.
I assume you are talking about this statement made by Steve Langasek: | Sure; the distribution rights are contingent on accepting the specified | court's jurisdiction over the license agreement. This impinges simple | redistribution. Please explain how this is different than accepting any random country's copyright laws when distributing copyrighted material created by a citizen of that country. --Adam -- Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
