[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>>How do you distinguish a requirement that the user abide by some >>>remote court's process from a requirement that the user pet a cat, >>>volunteer for some personally distasteful organization, etc? Are >>>those DFSG-free requirements? >> At least, these are obvious limitation on *using* the program (you >> cannot use it unless you actively do something). >They are gratuitous limitations on things outside of the freedoms that >DFSG aims to guarantee, and choice of venue is no different. Why does >the "actively do something" part matter at all? Would a license that >prohibits users from doing those things be free, since that is not an >"active" requirement? It looks very "active" to me, but maybe I did not choose the right word.
-- ciao, Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
