Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2. Swedish law provides protection agains "confusingly similar" > trademarks only when the two marks in question denote goods of > the same or similar kinds. (Varum=E4rkeslag 1960:644, 6 =A7). This > is not the case here.
I don't think white goods and software are yet the same class of goods. > 3. That leaves the copyright to the swirl, [...] It feels a bit odd to suggest that we allege copyright infringement over using a modified debian logo for another purpose. I thought the logo copyright was transferred to SPI to allow it to be licensed following the DFSG. Elektrostore jumped the gun, but should we slap them now only to issue a public copyright licence soon? Seems like a waste of time, that one. It would be more interesting to collect up these other spirals into a gallery, like the penguin galleries. Trademark question: can we stop groups who use debian domain names to sell other distributions? Are we or SPI doing so? -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
