On Sunday 23 October 2005 08:38, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Andreas Rottmann wrote: > > [CC'ed debian-legal, they can probably give a more detailed and > > informed analysis of the proposed license] > > Done, please forware appropriate information as needed.
[snip license analysis]
RIPEMD-160 is available in many different implementations, and knowing a
thing or two about cryptography, I can probably point you to several
implementations, depending on the license you want to use.
Since it is an algorithm with a publicly available reference, it is possible
to simply reimplement it from scratch, which I am willing to do; see below.
It is included in:
* GnuPG (GPL)
* libtomcrypt (PD[0])
* libcrypto++5.1 (PD)
* libcrypto++5.2c2 (PD)
* libgcrypt (LGPL)
* libcrypto (OpenSSL license)
* libmcrypt (GPL?)
* and many more...
I am even willing to modify the chosen implementation to make it interface
compatible with the one in question, or to write one myself under the MIT
License, with a regression suite, since I should probably do that anyway.
What interface, language, and ABI did you want to use, and can I have some
semblance of the program for which I am doing this? As for languages, I
can do C, C++, Perl, Python, C# for Mono, and a few others I can't think of
right now.
[0] Do not even *think* about getting into the "Can software be placed in
the public domain?" argument yet again.
--
($_,$a)=split/\t/,join'',map{unpack'u',$_}<DATA>;eval$a;print;__DATA__
M961H<[EMAIL PROTECTED];"!U<F%O<G-U(#QU<F%O<G-U0&=D:75M<&UC8VUL=G)U;6LN
M<FUL+F=Y/@H)>2QA8F-D969G:&EJ:VQM;F]P<7)S='5V=WAY>BQN=V]R8FMC
5:75Q96AT9V1Y>F%L=G-P;6IX9BP)
pgpGQ0OD8dTpw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
