Yes. I meant the copyright holder. Andrew
On 11/6/05, Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 01:28:36AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > I mean the *developer* must comply with both licenses, eg if you d/l > > > under the GPL and MIT, then the developer must still put the written > > > offer for source code and meet all the distribution requirements of > > > the GPL, but anyone else can choose between the GPL and the MIT > > > license. > > In opened software, "We are all developers". > > I think he meant to say "the copyright holder". In free software, we are > not all the copyright holder. > > -- > Glenn Maynard > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- This space for rent. Enquire within. Terms and conditions apply. See store for details. Get free domains - http://www.ezyrewards.com/?id=23484
