On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 09:18:20PM +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > Are you proposing that any other (i.e. non-Mozilla) package in main, > that is licensed under MPL or MPL-derivate has to be expelled?
I'm merely agreeing with the general sentiment that the MPL is non-free. That does mean I agree that all software only available under the MPL has to be relicensed or removed. I don't have the energy or motivation to actually try to push for this (also, "IANADD"), but if Mozilla officially finishes their licensing change and makes a public announcement about it, you should be prepared for those that do to start making noise again. > I maintain firebird2[1] packages and I'd be very badly surprised if I'd > have to ask for its removal. firebird is licensed under Interbase Public > license (IPL), and new files are under Initial Developer Public License. > Both of them are MPL-clones with all the nasty source-of-venue and > keep-source-available-12-months clauses. See them at the Copyright link > at [1] (too long to be posted here) Do you agree that the license is non-free? (It sounds like you do, calling those clauses "nasty" and all.) -- Glenn Maynard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
