One thing that came up when I was emailing Mark was that I didn't have (or couldn't find) a stock document I could point to about why "Licensed under the same terms as foo" is bad. That's a shame, because I know I've seen the issue come up here and on other lists before.
So, I've written a rough draft of such a document, at http://people.debian.org/~piman/real-license.html . I'd appreciate suggestions, as well as more concrete cases where people have seen broken "licensed under the same terms as foo" statements. I'm sure licensing problems aren't restricted to only popular languages. :) -- Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
