On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 07:00:28PM +1100, Andrew Donnellan wrote: > Yes, I agree that it is still non-free, but it only causes practical > problems if used in that way. But it is still non free by the FSF Free > Software Definition Freedom 0 and by the DFSG. If there is an > alternative server, then it is still non-free but does not cause the > same practical problems.
Huh? If you're saying the clause doesn't cause problems when not using the software in ways described by the clause, that's true--just as restrictions on modification make no practical difference if you're not modifying the software--but I'm not sure how that's interesting. (Please don't top-post.) -- Glenn Maynard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
