[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >The fact that it's a restriction on derived works (§3) that is not >explicitly allowed by §4? I see no reason to believe that the DFSG applies to things like the name of a program, like it does not covers patents. There has never been a list of "explicitly allowed" requirements. This is just another way some people are trying to extend its meaning to cover areas it was never supposed to regulate.
And anyway, even if this were true I can't see why this would not be allowed by DFSG #4. -- ciao, Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
