Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 23:08:03 +0000 Matthew Garrett wrote: > > [...] >> While I won't actually try to use this as an argument of fact, the >> majority of people I've spoken to about this don't feel happy about >> declaring the QPL non-free. > > I'm not happy either. > Still, I declare the QPL non-free, because I actually think it's > non-free.
When I say "not happy", I mean "not convinced that it's non-free" rather than "declaring it non-free makes them sad". And yes, I've brought up the issues that the QPL has. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
