Alexander Terekhov wrote: > Well, Wallace v GPL aside for a moment, regarding misstatements of the > copyright act in the GPL, here's a quote from Lee Hollaar (the author of > http://digital-law-online.info/lpdi1.0/treatise2.html):
I think if you want to suggest to the FSF that the language "[h]owever, nothing else grants you permission to modify or distribute the Program or its derivative works" should be changed (or struck entirely), that'd be a perfectly reasonable suggestion. It can also be quite untrue in the case of a dual-licenced work. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
