* Bernhard R. Link: > But it lists no conditions that that stuff is in any way free. > When I do not misread it, it would even Microsoft to take any > GPLv3 program, extend it, build an API around the extensions > and distribute it together with their Operating system, only > having to give the source without any of their extensions.
They already do this with Interix. As you write, it's a GPLv2 violation. I'm surprised that the FSF suddenly cares so much about proprietary operating systems, although free and usable operating systems have been created since the last GPL revision. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
