On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 03:34:24AM +0100, Alexander Terekhov wrote: > On 1/18/06, Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1/18/06, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 01:48:11AM +0100, Alexander Terekhov wrote: > > > > Care to post a link to rules of New York? > > > > > > It's not up to me. You charged Moglen with offenses, you back it up. > > > > In this type of offence it sorta goes the other way around: let Moglen back > > up some of his fraudulent legal claims like "the GPL is not a contract" ("no > > need" to upper case disclaimers aside for a moment). > > Here's an example. > > http://groups.google.com/group/misc.int-property/msg/af75f708f55b4f5a > > (PTRAVEL is a practicing IP lawyer and litigator)
So this guy disagrees with Moglen, therefore Moglen is wrong and a fraud, based on what? His credentials? Moglen is also a practicing IP lawyer as well as a law professor. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]