On 1/20/06, Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are some (bad) parts in the linux kernel that are not GPL, and > even some parts which could be considered non-free. Look through the > individual file copyright notices.
Sorry, but under Moglen's own theory, it is enough to have a tiny piece of GNU GPL'd code to make the entire "program" (in this case kernel "as a whole", user space aside for a moment [RMS includes that as well]) GNU GPL'd. And, BTW, how come that the FSF's "compliance lab" didn't purify the kernel of *GNU*/Linux? regards, alexander.
