On 1/27/06, Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/27/06, Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1/27/06, Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What argument? > > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/01/msg00475.html > > Edwards has already explained it to you.
If you can give me a specific reference (message and paragraph) to where he addresses this point, I'd appreciate it. > A "question of law" is addressed by "likelihood of success on that > portion breach of contract claim that concerns its trademark" Which question of law is are you talking about here? What do you mean by "portion breach"? And why are you talking about trademarks? Do you really enjoy stringing words together without concern for their meaning? If you won't write something that means anything, is there some reason I should continue replying? Thanks, -- Raul
