On 1/27/06, Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Glenn L. McGrath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all;
> >
> > This question doesn't directly relate to debian, but i hope you can
> > help straighten me out with this.
> >
> > I'm trying to understand licensing obligations in regard to GPL'ed
> > binaries that link to GPL incompatible libraries.
>
> First of all, don't pay attention to anything that Alexander Terekhov
> writes. He is the biggest troll I have seen on debian-legal for a
Landry, Landry. Bad memory you have. You've been "trolled" by me long
ago on boost.org.
("Gah. I have been trolled." last link below)
http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2004/05/64968.php
http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2004/05/65036.php
http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2004/05/65056.php
http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2004/05/65062.php
http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2004/05/65070.php
http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2004/05/65083.php
http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2004/05/65086.php
http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2004/05/65107.php
[... "whole" ... machine ...]
Only machine? Why not GPL a whole building?
regards,
alexander.
