On 1/28/06, Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Harrassing lawsuits are the extreme case. It's a similar problem with, > for example, honest but incorrect claims. I don't see why the licensor > should get to override the venue in *any* case where he's the one > instigating the lawsuit.
So what "honest but incorrect claims" does this license allow that could be problematic? In the sense of alleging specifc misbehavior. I'm just not seeing it. Thanks, -- Raul
