On 03/02/06, olive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > You do realize that even the FSF does not think that the GFDL is a > > free license? They just don't think that freedom is as important for > > documentation as in software. > > That is totally untrue; see for example: http://www.gnu.org/doc/doc.html
Did you more than glance at the page you linked to? That article totally supports Walter's point. Not only are the freedoms to change and to redistribute changes excluded from the page you linked to, the page also refers to the essay "Free Software and Free Manuals", in which RMS explains why freedom is not as important for documentation. Actually I think I see a pattern here. Mistaking the OSI for an organisation that has the purpose of promoting free software might also be the result of cursory reading.