olive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > You do realize that even the FSF does not think that the GFDL is a > > free license? They just don't think that freedom is as important for > > documentation as in software. > > That is totally untrue; see for example: http://www.gnu.org/doc/doc.html
Please read the archives http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/09/msg01221.html "I am not sure if the GFDL is a free software license, but I don't think the question matters. http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/09/msg00990.html "You've asked me to explain why the criteria for free documentation licenses should be different from free software licenses (or, as you would perhaps put it, free computer program licenses). I would rather ask why they should be the same, since they deal with different situations." http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/09/msg00783.html "Manuals are not free software, because they are not software." Cheers, Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
