On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 11:31:38 +1100, Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[...] > i challenge any of you zealots to come up with a REAL WORLD, PRACTICAL > proof that the GFDL is non-free (and i mean actually non-free, not > merely inconvenient. the DFSG does not require convenience, only > freedom). I don't really understand what you mean by a real world, practical proof. The way that Debian evaluates licenses as being non-free is if they have restrictions that run counter to the DFSG. If it is possible that a situation can arise where a license restricts someone from doing things that the DFSG says that he/she should be allowed to do, then that license should, IMHO, be considered non-free. But perhaps I'm just misunderstanding what you mean by "proof". As a mathematician, no proofs to me are real world, nor practical. BTW, can non-zealots offer proofs as well, or is this challenge only open to zealots? -- Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.uhoreg.ca/ PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
