[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> and for >> GPLv2(2)(c) in particular. >Bad example; if that clause were in any other license, it probably would >have been declared non-free a long time ago. Yes, and this shows quite clearly how a few people on debian-legal@ are trying to change the meaning of the DFSG which was widely accepted until a few years ago.
-- ciao, Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
