you people love to recycle the same lies over and over and over again. i'm becoming convinced that it is a deliberate strategy - repeat the same lies and eventually everyone will just give up out of exhaustion.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 01:42:44PM -0700, Hubert Chan wrote: > 3a only says that a binary has to be *accompanied* with the source code. > Hence it can be on a separate medium. So you can distribute your 1KB > chip, stapled to a CD-ROM that contains the source, and still comply > with the terms of the GPL. you can do the same with GFDL documents. e.g. the stupid coffee cup example so popular with you zealots - if you can't fit the invariant sections on the cup itself, then print it on paper and include it in the box. "problem" solved. for some reason, though, you zealots ignore that inconvenience, or treat it as free for the GPL and other licenses, but consider it beyond the pale and non-free for the GFDL. > But it gets even better. You don't even have to accompany the binary > with the source itself. If you want, you can instead: the GFDL has a similar provision. you can provide a link to an internet address containing the full document. craig -- craig sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (part time cyborg) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]