* Marco d'Itri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >I wouldn't take this any farther than what the GR explicitly said- GFDL > >w/o invariant sections are free. Otherwise, 'normal' (ie: prior to the > >GR) rules apply. If people want to change the DFSG then they'll need to > >actually do that, this GR didn't, just added an explicit exception. If > If it wanted to added an exception it would have done so. > This GR just established the correct interpretation of the DFSG for this > license.
Err, so you agree with me? How is it not an exception when it's just
for this license?
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
