Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I still think such a philosophy is an invitation to get in legal > trouble, but it seems to be the preferred choice of the developers. > At least Debian still believes in removing stuff without free licenses > from Debian if the licensors decide to actually enforce their licenses > as written.
But the GR didn't say anything about any license other than the GFDL. I don't think it's justified to claim that the developers who voted for the GR were pushing a new philosophy for interpreting licenses without explicit evidence. -- Jeremy Hankins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP fingerprint: 748F 4D16 538E 75D6 8333 9E10 D212 B5ED 37D0 0A03 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
