Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry for replying twice, but the LPPL (LaTeX Public Project License) > stuff --- the new version which was, in large part, driven by -legal, > would be interesting too.
And probably a better starting example for his tool than the other examples, because the discussion finally came to a consensus, or at least a resolution, which is not so obvious in the GFDL case... Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX)
