=?ISO-8859-1?Q?No=E8l_K=F6the?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > kolabd was rejected by ftpmaster because of this schema license text [...] > The text is the same like the one from core.schema from openldap2.2
That's really strange. How can one include 'Portions' of something when forbidden to modify it in any way? > Can anybody tell me what to do: > a. include rfc2739.schema because its like core.schema? Not without talking to ftpmaster, unless you like rejection. > b. write a bug against openldap2.2 because they have the same problem? Probably. > c. maybe it rfc releated and need waiting for RFC license discussion (i > dont know the status of it)? The RFC copyright licence problems have been discussed. See http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/02/threads.html#00151 for one possibly relevant thread (anyone got a better link?) > d. something else? Find a way to avoid the copyright material and achieve the same effect as using it. Sorry there's no easy answers :-/ -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
