> On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 08:10:30PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: >> That's how I understand the clause too. Contaminates other software >> (DFSG 9). >> I'm amazed it got into main. Serious bug. > > How does that contaminate other software? I agree that there may be a > problem, but only for users of Bacula.
I would like to understand that as well, especially since I explicitly indicate in LICENSE that certain parts of the code not copyrighted by myself are licensed under the GPL with no modifications. John, could you or someone else summarize a bit where we are assuming the following? - I delete the anti-abuse paragraph from the LICENSE entitled: "Termination for IP or Patent Action". - I change the manual license to be GPL v2. Specifically, what I would like to know is: are there any other problems with the licensing? Best regards, Kern -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
